Olympic Logo !

Moderators: Jay2k1, The_One, DavidM

User avatar
Jelly
Posts: 428
Joined: 11-01-2004 17:11

Post by Jelly » 04-06-2007 23:41

That is very ugly ..

Even the colours. Pink and Yellow? wtf?

beefsack
Posts: 921
Joined: 09-03-2003 22:57
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

Post by beefsack » 05-06-2007 01:32

i thought the germany logo was hot :o but yeah, gg poms for ugliest logo in the universe :p

ps goatse logo is the best

BunnyS
Senior Member
Posts: 1943
Joined: 02-06-2005 13:46

Post by BunnyS » 05-06-2007 02:27

what gets me is the fact that it's cost £400,000.


:| seriously ? for some shit anyone could have designed lol

User avatar
Adversary
Posts: 186
Joined: 26-08-2006 12:34

Post by Adversary » 05-06-2007 13:23

there are more colours than just that... I don't think the logo is that bad.

And i don't know why your supprised, theres far more worse examples of ridiculous price tags for stuff anyone could have done in contemporary art...

priior
Senior Member
Posts: 644
Joined: 01-11-2003 06:16

Post by priior » 05-06-2007 13:25


User avatar
Mighty Midget
Senior Member
Posts: 304
Joined: 16-04-2006 23:48

Post by Mighty Midget » 05-06-2007 14:02

"We chose the River Thames because it flows through the centre of London and is the point at which many of the city's waterways [...] meet."


No shit??!! Damned! I always thought they would meet in a pond somewhere in Sutton. You know, that is a very clever observation.
"The ribbon delivers that and can be used in many creative ways in the campaign to win the 2012 Olympic Games for London."
Well, yeah... If your name is Gary Glitter.

User avatar
DavidM
Posts: 6795
Joined: 08-03-2003 20:35
Contact:

Post by DavidM » 05-06-2007 14:24

wait, is the logo suppposed to look like london?

User avatar
Adversary
Posts: 186
Joined: 26-08-2006 12:34

Post by Adversary » 05-06-2007 17:57

thats about the olympic bid logo btw

http://ppleyard.org.uk/postimages/london2012.gif

User avatar
DavidM
Posts: 6795
Joined: 08-03-2003 20:35
Contact:

Post by DavidM » 05-06-2007 18:41

that looks like something!

User avatar
[1234]Jr
Posts: 1693
Joined: 19-03-2003 14:52

Post by [1234]Jr » 06-06-2007 08:49

fro wrote: oh internet, why did you not pick out the obvious one...

http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/5528 ... tsett1.jpg

(its now since been pulled from the bbc's listing of alternate logos and been replaced by some other shit)
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha

BunnyS
Senior Member
Posts: 1943
Joined: 02-06-2005 13:46

Post by BunnyS » 08-06-2007 10:57

yeah lol they even had the goatse on the news I think the video is on youtube somewhere :D

User avatar
snackbar
Posts: 335
Joined: 31-05-2005 02:33

Post by snackbar » 22-06-2007 07:13

i heard it'll likely be changed though due to the reactions.
we have a cute one:

Image

BunnyS
Senior Member
Posts: 1943
Joined: 02-06-2005 13:46

Post by BunnyS » 22-06-2007 11:37

aww that is kinda cute :)


Some MP's have been calling for it to be changed but the Olympic committed still stand by it and say it's staying. The inspectors who recently came to asses the progress of the sites and bid etc have said they love it. There point is that it's not just a logo to stay 2d on a t-shirt or some leaflet but can be visually exciting in other ways and can "grow" as a logo.... or some crap. I still think it's shit but it's here to stay so nvm :)

priior
Senior Member
Posts: 644
Joined: 01-11-2003 06:16

Post by priior » 22-06-2007 12:58

and for those who don;t get the reference, it's an inukchuk (native american stone thingies)

http://www.dobmagazine.nickles.com/gall ... _0093.html

priior
Senior Member
Posts: 644
Joined: 01-11-2003 06:16

Post by priior » 23-06-2007 13:10

omg ijust figured out the london logo is spelling 2012! lol god im slow!

i mean.. god thats an ugly logo!

Locked